Six Degrees Of Paramilitary Separation

Hrrrm… A number of newspapers representing the British Unionist minority in the north-east of the country are stirring up controversy over the appointment of Rosa McLaughlin as the vice-principle of St Mary’s College in Derry. The cause of their vociferous outrage is Ms. McLaughlin’s conviction in 1998 by a British no-jury, counter-insurgency court in the North of Ireland on the basis of an alleged ”confession” given to British paramilitary police (the RUC) where it is claimed she admitted to being an Intelligence Officer of the Irish Republican Army. Rosa, who was 26 years of age at the time and a local school teacher, was immediately released having already served 17 months in prison while awaiting trial (and as a nod to then ongoing Peace Process).

So, just as a matter of historical balance, I present below a picture of Peter Robinson, the head of the DUP, the largest Unionist political party in Ireland, a former member of the British Parliament, a current member of the Stormont Assembly and presently the Joint-First Minister of the North of Ireland. Here he is in 1987 attending a rally of the Ulster Resistance (or UR), a British terrorist organisation later involved in the smuggling of arms and explosives from the Lebanon to Ireland with the support of the then Apartheid-regime in South Africa, and under the direction of the British Security Service MI5. Robinson is wearing an Ulster Resistance red beret alongside others in UR paramilitary uniforms, including one Noel Little. The latter was a former British soldier (in the notorious UDR militia) and chairman of the Armagh branch of the Ulster Clubs, a quasi-military organisation which helped found the Ulster Resistance terror group, and like Robinson a member of Ian Paisley’s self-made Free Presbyterian Church. At this time Little was also a senior member of the UDA/UFF, the main British terrorist faction in Ireland, and was later arrested in Paris with two other UDA men selling stolen British missile parts to South African agents in return for further arms shipments from the White supremacist regime in Pretoria.

A year before this picture was taken, on the 7th of August 1986, Peter Robinson had led 500 Unionist militants, including members of the Ulster Clubs and Ian Paisley’s Third Force grouping, in the invasion of the small Irish village of Clontibret in County Monaghan. During the incursion, which terrified the inhabitants of the village and surrounding areas, the local station of the Gardaí (the unarmed, Irish civilian police service) was attacked, two Gardaí were taken hostage and beaten, and a “military parade” was held on the main street. The invasion was only repulsed when Garda reinforcements arrived, Peter Robinson and his supporters fleeing back across the border during which a number of shots were fired.

Peter Robinson leads Ulster Resistance militants in a rally

Peter Robinson leads Ulster Resistance militants in a rally, British Occupied North of Ireland, 1987, including Noel Little, UDA terrorist and arms smuggler

The second photograph below is a more recent one of Peter Robinson with John Smyth Junior, taken in 2010. Smyth, a former DUP election candidate and member of the Orange Order, recently pleaded guilty to a bomb attack targeting the home of a Polish family in Antrim claimed by a faction of  the UDA/UFF. Coincidentally he is also the son of the prominent DUP Councillor John Smyth who was convicted for terrorist offences in the 1970s, including a fire-bomb attack by a UVF British terror gang on the home of a Nationalist family.

Former DUP member John Smyth Junior pictured with his party leader Peter Robinson in 2010

Former DUP member John Smyth Junior pictured with his party leader Peter Robinson in 2010

Rosa McLaughlin’s past is known. To her family, her friends  her community and her employers. But there are many others in the north-east of Ireland whose pasts remain wrapped in shadows.

About these ads

Unionists Do Not Use Political Violence – Really They Don’t

Former DUP member John Smyth Junior pictured with his party leader Peter Robinson in 2010

Former DUP member John Smyth Junior pictured with his party leader Peter Robinson in 2010

The main political representatives of the British Unionist minority in the north-east of Ireland, the DUP, UUP and TUV, have no involvement in political violence or those who engage in political violence. Nor have they ever.

So it is entirely coincidental that John Smyth Junior, a former DUP election candidate and member of the Orange Order, has pleaded guilty to a bomb attack targeting the home of a Polish family in Antrim claimed by a faction of the British terrorist group the UDA/UFF. It is also coincidental that Smyth is the son of the prominent DUP Councillor John Smyth who was convicted for terrorist offences by British militants in the 1970s, including a UVF fire-bomb attack on the home of a Nationalist family.

But the British Unionist parties have no involvement in political violence. Or those who engage in it.

Britain’s War In Ireland – Learning The Lessons

Bloody Sunday Massacre, Derry, Ireland, 1972

Bloody Sunday Massacre, Derry, Ireland, 1972

The Irish journalist and author Finian Cunningham examines the conflict in the north-east of Ireland during the late 1960s and early ‘70s and draws some lessons in relation to France’s present military intervention in Mali. His description of the origins and early years of the Northern War are particularly noteworthy:

“This week sees the anniversary of one of the worst massacres in modern Irish history, when British paratroopers murdered 14 unarmed civilians in cold blood.

On 30 January 1972, the British troops opened fire on a civil rights march in Derry City, Northern Ireland’s second city after Belfast, in full glare of the international news media.

Half of the victims that day were teenagers, shot in the head or in the back by British snipers. Some of the fatally wounded were shot multiple times as they tried to crawl to safety. Others were cut down in a hail of bullets as they tended to those lying wounded, bleeding on the ground.

One iconic image from that horrific day shows a Catholic priest, Fr Edward Daly, holding up a bloodstained white cloth, pleading with the British soldiers to cease-fire as he helped carry a dying youth.

Bloody Sunday, as it became known, was a watershed event. From then on, the conflict in Northern Ireland exploded. Some 3,000 people would lose their lives in the ensuing decades of violence – a huge death toll for the tiny population, equivalent to 240,000 in Iran or 900,000 in the United States.

Many Irish citizens, outraged by the British army slaughter, went on to join the ranks of the newly formed Provisional Irish Republican Army, the armed guerrilla movement that would kill hundreds of British troops and police and take the war to the very streets of London, with massive bombing campaigns in the British capital and other major cities.

Prior to the arrival of the British troops, the British-controlled Northern Ireland saw an outbreak of violence in the summer of 1968 when Nationalists began agitating for equal civil rights under the corrupt pro-British Unionist administration. Peaceful demonstrations by Nationalists were subsequently attacked by Unionist gangs and paramilitaries, aided and abetted by the sectarian state police force. Many civilians were killed as Nationalist communities were shot at and burned out of their homes and workplaces in reprisals over their political demands.

The Unionist-dominated province of Northern Ireland brought international disgrace to the United Kingdom, and the London government was obliged to post thousands of British soldiers “to restore order”. At first, Nationalist communities welcomed the British troops when they were deployed in August 1969, believing the army to be affording protection from marauding Unionist paramilitaries and police.

When the British army went into Northern Ireland in 1969, it soon became apparent that the intervention had nothing to do with protecting Nationalist civilians, under the boot of the Unionist statelet, and everything to do with suppressing the political challenge being posed by Irish separatism, which wanted to dismantle the British partition of Ireland and to create a united, independent country, free from London’s political control.

The pretext used by London for despatching troops to Northern Ireland concealed its real purpose. That agenda was to target the Nationalist population with state terrorism for political ends. Whereas in previous years, the Unionist paramilitaries could rely on the collusion of the local police force to terrorise, from 1969 onwards these forces had the full might of the British army to ramp up the violence against Nationalist civilians and thereby intimidate them from supporting political opposition to the British government’s presence in Ireland.

The year before Bloody Sunday, in August 1971, British paratroopers shot dead 11 unarmed civilians in the Ballymurphy area of West Belfast. Among the dead was a 50-year-old woman, Joan Connolly, who had been standing peacefully on the street. Another victim was a priest, Fr. Hugh Mullan, who was shot dead while trying to assist a man wounded on the ground. [ASF: Click on the link for more on the Ballymurphy Massacre]

On 9 July 1972 – six months after Bloody Sunday – British troops again shot dead five unarmed Nationalist civilians in another area of West Belfast, Springhill. Three of the victims were children, including 13-year-old Margaret Gargan, who was shot in the head by a British sniper as she was walking to her home. The two adults who died that day, Patrick Butler and Fr. Noel Fitzpatrick, were killed with the same bullet, it ripping through one man’s head into the other. One of the survivors of the Springhill massacre later told how, as he lay wounded, bullets were ricocheting off the ground near his head, fired by British soldiers who had taken up position in a nearby timber yard that overlooked the residential neighbourhood.

On another occasion during that year, a friend of this author told how when he was only a young boy he witnessed his father and a neighbour being shot at by British troops, while they were painting the family home in West Belfast. The neighbour was blown off the ladder when a high-velocity round slammed into his upper leg. It was fired by British soldiers dug in a couple of kilometres away on the Black Mountain looking down on the housing estate. Just one of countless acts of gratuitous violence committed against the civilian population by British troops.

During these gun attacks on Nationalist communities, the British army would often work hand-in-glove with Unionist paramilitaries, or death squads, as they fired into family homes, indiscriminately killing the occupants. That secret policy of collusion between British forces and Unionist death squads would later be refined with even more deadly impact.

It should be noted that this wanton state terrorism by British forces was taking place in a part of the United Kingdom, where there was supposedly the rule of law, human rights and due process.”

 

Bloody Sunday Massacre, Derry, Ireland, 1972

Bloody Sunday Massacre, Derry, Ireland, 1972

Democracy Doesn’t Work – So Speaks Unionism

Local government regulations in the North of Ireland during the 1950s - when the British national flag flew for 15 days a year from government buildings not the present 17 days - let alone 365 days a year!

Local government regulations in the North of Ireland during the 1950s – when the British national flag flew for 15 days a year from government buildings not the present 17 days – let alone 365 days a year!

From the cheeky lads at “Loyalists Against Democracy” the image above details local government rules in “Northern Ireland” during the 1950s – when the British national flag flew for fifteen days a year from government buildings (not the present seventeen designated days).

Anti-democracy protesters from the British Unionist minority in Belfast, Ireland - "Democracy Doesn't Work"

Anti-democracy protesters from the British Unionist minority in Belfast, Ireland – “Democracy Doesn’t Work”

Jenny Muir Quits The British Labour Grouping In The North

Green Party in Northern Ireland

Green Party in “Northern Ireland”

A minor political event which has probably passed most observers by. Jenny Muir, long-time left-wing Belfast blogger and would-be British Labour Party activist in the North of Ireland has formally quit Labour. This follows many years of campaigning to have the British political party expand from Britain to Ireland to organise and stand in the north-east of the country. Thankfully the London leadership of Labour repeatedly rejected these attempts at anschluss from the UK but its interesting to see where Jenny Muir has gone: the Green Party “of Northern Ireland”. The northern Greens are officially a regional branch of Comhaontas Glas – the Green Party of Ireland – and since the 1990s have supported an All-Ireland policy (later modified through support for the 1998 Belfast Agreement). As a left-of-centre ecological party they have been moderately sucessful with environmentally-focused Nationalist voters and liberal Unionists agnostic on continued British rule.

However of late the internal-consensus on the party’s ultimate national affiliations have been under pressure. In 2011 the  Antrim branch of the party introduced a motion to the annual general meeting in Belfast to sever relations with the southern wing of the organisation (a move which some represented as stemming from the party’s embarrassment over links to their badly discredited southern counterparts in the aftermath of the fall of the Celtic Tiger economy of Ireland). This was rejected by a majority but party tensions have been evident since then, most recently in the reluctance of party leader, Stephen Agnew, to press for civil rights legislation for Irish-speakers in the North of Ireland. These disagreements can also be seen in the very public criticisms of (former) Green councillor Cadogan Enright.

Muir, who regards the centre-left and Labour sister-party of the SDLP as another player in “sectarian politics” (and I hope I don’t misrepresent her in this summation), seems comfortable enough with the Greens’ All-Ireland status, and she will certainly be a highly valuable activist for the party. But I wonder will this and other changes pull the party in a more “Pro-Union” (if not Unionist) direction?

UPDATE 19/01/13:  Jenny Muir replies below in the Comments clarifying some points.

That Infamous Nolan Show

Well a lot of people have been discussing last night’s highly controversial Nolan Show from the BBC in Belfast which debated the anti-democracy protests by the extreme of the British Unionist community in the north-east of Ireland. I say “debated” when I probably mean “fought over” as the show descended into chaos with a Unionist-dominated audience attacking virtually every speaker and every non-Unionist contributor to the programme. It may have made for car-crash TV as a baying mob took over a prime time BBC regional news and current affairs show but it was certainly illustrative of the attitudes and politics of the Unionist mob.

Above is a YouTube video of the 16.01.2013 Nolan Show. Watch it while you can!

Nick Greger, a leading British fascist, poses with the infamous Johnny Adair, a former senior British terrorist with the UDA-UFF terror group

Nick Greger, a leading British fascist, poses with the infamous Johnny Adair, a former senior British terrorist with the UDA-UFF terror group

Meanwhile a report from Niall O’Dowd in the Irish Central on some of the Far Right and Neo-Nazi elements in Britain who are supporting the Unionist anti-democracy demonstrations in the North of Ireland. Frequently led and directed by members of the British terrorist group the UVF these protests have drawn allies from the British fascist party, the BNP, as well as sundry extremist groups like Britain First. Of course the close ties between separatist British terrorism in Ireland and the Far Right in Britain go back many decades as I examined in a lengthy post here, which takes in everything and everyone from Apartheid-era South Africa to the British Army killer Johnny Adair.

The Ballot-Box And Petrol-Bomb – Unionism In Action

Irish communities under British siege - the Short Strand, Belfast, Ireland 2013

Irish communities under British siege – the Short Strand, Belfast, Ireland 2013

The best of British – in Ireland.

The Violence Of The British Anti-Democrats In Ireland

Northern Ireland - The Last Remnant Of The British Colony In Ireland

Northern Ireland – The Last Remnant Of The British Colony In Ireland (Original Photo: The Five Demands)

Well the worse weekend yet of rioting and violent attacks by anti-democracy protesters from the British Unionist monitory in the north-east of Ireland. Days (and nights) of sustained disturbances in several areas, notably the city of Belfast, dozens injured, homes and businesses damaged, hijacked cars set alight, roads and streets blockaded, and as always assaults on the Irish Nationalist communities of the North, in particular the besieged enclave of the Short Strand.

The reasons for all this? Because the British Unionist minority in Ireland says’s no to democracy, as they have always done so, and through violence and the threat of violence they attempt to enforce their political views on everyone else in the country. Several weeks ago a majority of the elected members of Belfast City Council voted to reduce to the number of days the British national flag would fly from the rooftop of the city hall. From an original motion of no flags at all the council agreed a compromise motion of seventeen designated days when the British flag could be flown, thanks to discussions with the liberal Unionists of the small Alliance Party. These days were generally ones deemed to be of special significance to the city’s British Unionist community: the official birthday of Britain’s head of state, royal births and marriages and other ceremonial events.

Most councillors clearly believed that this was a fair compromise that generously favoured the Unionists since it gave no room for the majority Irish Nationalist community in Belfast to display their national identity in the city’s official architecture. But for the Unionist mob, initially urged on by the political leaders of Unionism in the form of the DUP head Peter Robinson and UUP boss Mike Nesbitt, even this half-hearted equality was too much to stomach. They wanted continued Unionist domination in Belfast and were quite prepared to risk anarchy on the streets to get it. And anarchy is what they achieved.

As the result of over a month of civil unrest by a militant minority from the British Unionist population in the north-east I have learned that further attempts to place both main communities in the city of Belfast on an equal footing have now been shelved. In particular private discussions between Sinn Féin and SDLP councillors to agree a motion to be submitted to the council’s policy and resources committee calling for the Irish national flag, the Tricolour, to be flown beside the British national flag on Saint Patrick’s Day (the 17th of March ironically being one of the “designated days”) have been suspended for fear of drawing even further Unionist violence.

So the anti-democrats of Unionism have won the flags’ issue in a sense. On March the 17th 2013, the feast-day and holiday of Ireland’s national saint, the British national flag will fly once again from the rooftop of Belfast City Hall. But the Irish national flag will not do so. For as usual, violence and the threat of violence by the British Unionist minority on the island of Ireland will have succeeded.

UPDATE: FJH has his own take on the rumours around the flying of the Tricolour on St. Patrick’s Day in Belfast.

The Endgame For The Anti-Democrats

The British Occupied North of Ireland or the real Northern Ireland 48% Protestant, 47% British

The British Occupied North of Ireland or the real Northern Ireland 48% Protestant, 47% British

Excellent opinion piece over on the Irish news-blog Slugger O’Toole from Gerry Lynch, a former Executive Director of the Alliance Party, a liberal Unionist group that receives limited electoral support from both communities in the North of Ireland. Lynch, who writes and blogs under the nom de plume “sammymorse”, could have been best described as a small “i” Irish Unionist. That is, he was someone who broadly favoured British rule over the north-east of Ireland for a number of political, economic or social reasons while expressing a mixed Irish and British identity of his own. The very type of person some Unionists claim first declared themselves ”Northern Irish” in the 2011 census of “Northern Ireland” (though, as I and others have cogently pointed out – and as some British Unionists fear – the emphasis is clearly on the “Irish” in that declaration).

Now he seems to have abandoned Unionism – and Britishness. While initially stating his belief that the so-called “Union” (i.e. British rule in the north-east of Ireland) is or was safe, he goes on to state the following:

“Sorry to be so blunt, but I want out of the United Kingdom as quickly as possible. I know it’s lovely when you have a decent income in London or Surrey. I have spent and continue to spend an enormous part of my adult life there. But if Unionism means anything it means that Belfast is as British as Finchley. And frankly, on that score, Britishness #epicfails.

Many people I respect will disagree with me, and I mean no disrespect to them or their country – I realise that real existierender Britishness falls well short of what many Britishers would like it to be. I rejoice as much as anyone at what it is and means for Mo Farah to carry the Union Flag as he celebrates Olympic Gold, when English Cricketers stuff the arrogant Aussies and, by God, I fall to my knees in honour of what it meant for my partner to fight frightened skirmishes with the Japanese in Burma as a young man and sleep standing up exhausted against a tree, night after night. I have no wish to disrespect the flag he fought for as he himself fought death from malaria and dysentery on a Bangladeshi beach in 1943. There is a best of British – from Rolls-Royce jet engines to The Italian Job. As an Irishman of nationalist and anti-monarchist instincts, neither I nor my views have been treated with anything less than respect and willingness to understand in the deepest Home Counties Shires. Sadly, that is not what I get in Belfast. There is a worst of British and it is right on my doorstep.

So, when the inevitable border poll inevitably comes, I will be voting for a United Ireland. Of course, it won’t be an actually united Ireland, and it will have new stupidities foisted on it by Gombeen men, but could it really be any worse than this?”

That is just a snippet of a far more detailed and nuanced article that deserves a full reading. But when even a dyed-in-the-wool Alliance supporter and culturally British voter in the North of Ireland can see that the writing is on the wall is it not time to face up to the fact that we are now truly in the end game?

As I said before, “Northern Ireland” is 48% Protestant, 47% British, and that is the real motivation behind the anti-democracy protests by the separatist British Unionist minority in the north-east of the island of Ireland. Not the flying of national flags.

Death Squad Britain

12 year old Maria McGurk, murdered by British state-controlled terrorists in 1971 at McGurk's Bar, Belfast, Ireland. Another victim of Britain's dirty war in Ireland.

12 year old Maria McGurk, murdered by British state-controlled terrorists in 1971 at McGurk’s Bar, Belfast, Ireland. Another victim of Britain’s dirty war in Ireland.

Two weeks ago the British prime minister, David Cameron, apologised in the UK parliament on behalf of the British nation for the assassination of the Irish civil rights lawyer Pat Finucane by gunmen from the UDA-UFF, a British terrorist organisation in the North of Ireland under the control of Britain’s paramilitary, military and intelligence services.

An official report into Pat Finucane’s murder by the former UN war crimes’ investigator Desmond de Silva, released the same day, catalogued the contributions made by various terrorist factions from the British Unionist minority in the north-east of Ireland to Britain’s counter-insurgency war against the Irish Republican Army and the Irish population in general, north and south of the border. In particular the report focused on the relationship between the terror gangs and the Royal Ulster Constabulary or RUC, the notorious British paramilitary police force disbanded by Britain as part of the Irish peace process, British Military Intelligence and its various secret armies (including the infamous Force Research Unit or FRU), as well as the British Security Service or MI5.

In one day some four decades worth of accusations and claims by politicians, lawyers, journalists, historians and human rights activists from Ireland, Britain, Europe and the United States were given vindication. There was now a de facto acknowledgement by the London authorities that Britain’s counter-insurgency war in Ireland consisted of a military strategy based upon state-terrorism, by and on behalf of the state, which traced its roots to the very start of the conflict. Since the publication of de Silva’s report, despite the hostility, resentment or indifference of some in the British media, many other stories from Britain’s “Dirty War” in Ireland have come back under the spotlight or started to leak out.

In an unusual move, and perhaps indicative of how much the recent revelations have shook the British establishment, the deeply conservative and jingoistic right-wing British newspaper, the Mail on Sunday, has a feature story on the earliest of Britain’s modern secret armies in Ireland, the Military Reaction Force (or MRF). In the early 1970s this band of out-of-uniform soldiers terrorised Irish Nationalist communities in the North of Ireland, in particular the city of Belfast, carrying out or organising random drive-by shootings of civilians, murders, kidnappings and bombings.

McGurk's Bar in Belfast on the 4th of December 1971, destroyed by a bomb that left dozens dead and wounded which was placed by British terrorists controlled by British Military Intelligence

McGurk’s Bar in Belfast on the 4th of December 1971, destroyed by a bomb that left dozens dead and wounded which was placed by British terrorists controlled by British Military Intelligence

In its most infamous operation the MRF arranged for terrorists from the British UVF to attack McGurk’s Bar in Belfast on the 4th of December 1971 with a parcel bomb that demolished the building killing fifteen, including 12 year old Maria McGurk, and wounding seventeen others. In the aftermath of the atrocity the British Forces used the excuse of “follow-up operations” to swamp local neighbourhoods with troops and paramilitary police who carried out destructive house-raids and multiple arrests or detentions.

Now the Mail has one of the MRF’s members apparently speaking on record:

“A former British soldier who belonged to an undercover unit in Northern Ireland has claimed he and his colleagues resorted to ‘murder and mayhem’ during a secret campaign against the IRA.

Simon Cursey was a member of a 30-man team which would ‘shoot first and ask questions later’.

Cursey says these shootings were carried out by the Military Reaction Force (MRF), a clandestine Army team sent into Republican neighbourhoods to eliminate IRA gunmen.

His accounts are being studied by detectives from the Police Service of Northern Ireland’s Historical Enquiries Team (HET), which was set up to re-examine suspicious deaths over  the course of ‘The Troubles’. More than 2,260 cases are on its books.

Cursey’s devastating disclosures include the claim that he never once cautioned a terror suspect or fired a warning shot before himself engaging with lethal force. He said he and his colleagues shot at least 20 men, though he could not say how many died.

‘The Rules of Engagement in Northern Ireland were very clear: you were only allowed to open fire at a person actively shooting at you or someone you are with. Also, you could open fire at someone aiming a weapon but who hadn’t fired yet. We had our own slight variation on these rules. We opened fire at any small group in hard areas, neighbourhoods that even looked suspicious, armed or not – it didn’t matter. We targeted specific groups that were always up to no good. These types were sympathisers and supporters, assisting the IRA movement.

‘As far as we were concerned they were guilty by association and party to terrorist activities, leaving themselves wide open to the ultimate punishment from us. If someone was picked up and it was discovered that they were illegally armed, or that they were on our “special” wanted list of IRA killers, they could be dealt with right there in the countryside: neutralised.’”

In other words the MRF was a British military death squad. Its purpose was simply to cause murder and mayhem in the Irish communities of the north-east that continued to live under the British Occupation by killing innocent and “guilty” alike. However the MRF’s reckless nature eventually brought about its own downfall and it’s operations were uncovered by the Intelligence Unit of the Belfast Brigade of the Irish Republican Army in mid-to-late 1972. After extensive surveillance units of the 2nd and 3rd Battalions of the Belfast Brigade attacked soldiers of the MRF at two different locations in the city on the 2nd of October 1972, killing or wounding several and causing panic in the British Army as intelligence operations over the following weeks effectively collapsed.

By early 1973 the now discredited MRF was disbanded but its tactics, techniques and most of its personnel went on to become part of the Special Reconnaissance Unit (or the SRU though it was also known by the cover name of the 14th Intelligence Company) and the Force Research Unit (FRU). All of them contributed to the evolving culture of Death Squad Britain.

Tweet at #deathsquadbritain

People Power – Taking Back The North

Census of “Northern Ireland” 2011, Aggregate Nationalities, Irish, Northern Irish, British

Census of “Northern Ireland” 2011, Aggregate Nationalities, Irish, Northern Irish, British

Sometimes the sheer two-faced hypocrisy of the average Unionist media sympathiser leaves one dumbfounded. And none more so than the ever-so flexible opinions of the Neo-Unionist apologist-writer Ruth Dudley-Edwards. As a “commentator” Dudley-Edwards has spent decades excoriating Irish Nationalism and Republicanism throughout the British and Irish media with repetitive allegations of tribalism, sectarianism, fascism and half-a-dozen other –isms. Yet a phrase frequently comes to mind when viewing her opinions: “…considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”

Her latest propagandist nonsense on behalf of the British Unionist minority in Ireland follows weeks of violent protests in relation to the decision by Belfast City Council to restrict the number of days the British flag flies from the roof of the city hall to periods deemed to be of special significance to the Unionist minority in the city. A compromise readily agreed to by Irish Nationalist and liberal Unionist councillors following precedents established elsewhere across the north-east of Ireland (including the northern regional legislature at Stormont where sits all the main Nationalist and Unionist parties).

Most intelligent observers know full well that the rioting and threats by extremists from the Unionist minority following the vote have nothing to do with the actual flying of the British national flag from Belfast City Hall. The issue goes far beyond that. For two centuries and more the city of Belfast was at the heart of “British Ulster”. It was a colonial city in a British colonial plantation, the most thorough and long-lasting such plantation in Ireland. Nowhere else, outside of Dublin, did British rule in Ireland grow such deep and pernicious roots. Yet the city of Dublin and its colonial hinterland (the Pale) fell to Irish Nationalism over a century ago through the political, cultural and economic changes that stemmed from changing demographics in the region (principally as a result of An Gorta Mór or the Great Famine of the mid-1800s and the influx of monolingual or bilingual Irish-speakers from the rural heartlands of north Leinster, south Ulster and Connacht).

Over the last twenty years a similar phenomenon has been observable in the North of Ireland, the last remnant of the British colony on the island of Ireland. As those with an Irish identity have grown in number those with a British identity have retreated into a tighter and tighter cluster of communities centred around the east coast and the city of Belfast in particular. Yet that city has seen its own growth from within as the dominant Unionist majority has been supplanted by a narrow Nationalist majority, the vote by the city council reflecting that sea-change in population and allegiances.

That is the real story behind the flags’ issue. The “rivalry” between two national communities in the north-east of the country and the slow move towards demographic equilibrium. Rather than dam the Nationalist tide through the Peace Process and Belfast Agreement, which all-but ended forty years of military struggle, if anything the new power-sharing arrangements have accelerated the changes. The Irish Nationalist community, however one defines it, is in the ascendant across the greater part of the north-east of Ireland, in the process making many of the old statistical justifications for the British-imposed partition of the island irrelevant. If the country was to be partitioned today in order to appease the violence of the British minority on the island of Ireland, that minority would find itself retreating into a redoubt consisting of slivers of land taken from north Down, north-east Armagh, south and west Antrim, and eastern Derry. Belfast would find itself a candidate to become the new “West and East Berlin” of Europe; a city divided between the two nation-states of Ireland and the UK.

It is this dawning reality that is driving Unionism, giving it the new impetuous and purpose that sympathisers like Dudley-Edwards crave.

It’s not about a flag – it’s the demographics, stupid.

Flying The British Flag – To Threaten Irish Schoolchildren

Holy Cross Girls Primary School, Belfast, under siege by British Unionist gangs, 2001 (Photo: Justin Kernoghan)

Holy Cross Girls Primary School, Belfast, under siege by British Unionist gangs, 2001 (Photo: Justin Kernoghan)

So, yet another night of low-level violence and rioting from the extreme of the British Unionist minority in the north-east of Ireland. That would be more or less the fifteenth night in a row since Belfast City Council voted by a majority to reduce the number of days the British national flag will fly over the council hall after decades of disputed display. The reduction is from a year round flying of the banner to 17 “designated days”, ones of particular importance to the British minority, and was agreed as a compromise gesture to the Unionist community despite the city’s now Irish Nationalist majority. In contrast no proposals were put forward by any party for the flying of the Irish national flag despite the presumed wishes of many in the city to see it alongside (or instead of) the British one.

For Unionists in the north-east of the country the agreement to make Belfast City Hall and other municipal buildings politically neutral and open to all communities was a direct threat to the public face of their centuries old hegemony, held since the heyday of British colonial rule. The truth of course is that their absolute power in the “Northern Pale”, the last remnants of the British colony in Ireland, has long since faded. Well, not quite. While some politicians from the British minority protest at the alleged loss of their “Britishness” (by which they mean, privileges) there is another story. Despite the fact that those who profess or stem from families with a Roman Catholic faith are now in the majority in the North of Ireland, they remain subject to ongoing institutionalised discrimination in employment, education, state services, the courts and, as always, even in the prisons.

The Irish Times reveals that the annual report issued by the statutorily independent Criminal Justice Inspection group (CJI) into the notorious Maghaberry Prison states that there had been:

“…no progress to address the long-standing issue of disparity in treatment between Catholic and Protestant prisoners, with Catholics not faring as well.

The unequal outcomes primarily related to the granting of benefits or application of sanctions where staff had a measure of discretion.

This equality issue has been identified in all Northern Ireland’s prisons since the CJI began its inspection work in 2004.

“Maghaberry’s own statistics have confirmed that in terms of equality there were still unequal outcomes for Catholic prisoners in several important areas,” said Mr McGuigan.

“Yet this sensitive issue was not being addressed and we have recommended the Northern Ireland Prison Service to take action to deliver equality of outcomes for all prisoners.”

He added: “It’s been a feature of prison inspections since we started them in 2004.””

So, despite the claimed loss of Unionist (or Protestant) power over the last decade the facts on the ground prove that Roman Catholics (or Irish Nationalists) remain subject to continued discrimination in all sectors of society. However the Unionists are still seeking a mechanism to “defend” or “restore” their supremacist days. And it’s an old one. If threatening the adult members of the community you perceive as the enemy seems to be getting you nowhere, don’t worry – just threaten their children instead. From the Irish News:

“UNION flags have been erected outside Holy Cross Girls Primary School – the scene of a bitter Loyalist protest a decade ago which made headlines around the world.

Flags were also flying yesterday outside two other Catholic girls’ schools within a small area of north Belfast as the dispute over the removal of the Union flag at the city hall intensified.

Our Lady of Mercy Secondary School at Bilston Road near Ballysillan was adorned with flags, as was Mercy Primary girls school on Crumlin Road.

There are fears that the development will lead to heightened tensions in the area.

During the Holy Cross dispute of 2001 riot police had to escort schoolgirls and their parents past hate-filled protesters on the journey to the Catholic school through the Protestant Glenbryn estate.

Loyalists claimed they had picketed Holy Cross after a parent attacked a man putting up a loyalist flag on a lamp-post opposite the school.

Urine-filled balloons were pelted at the little girls.

At one point a blast bomb was thrown at the pupils and their parents.”

Intimidating Irish schoolchildren. British nationalism at its finest.

Named And Shamed – The Faces Of Britain’s Death Squads In Ireland

The Cairo Gang - Britain's notorious death squad in Ireland during the War of Independence, c.1920

The Cairo Gang – Britain’s notorious death squad in Ireland during the War of Independence, c.1920

Gunmen from the Force Research Unit (FRU), Britain's notorious death squad in Ireland during the Northern War, pose with their weapons, 1980s

Gunmen from the Force Research Unit (FRU), Britain’s notorious death squad in Ireland during the Northern War, pose with their weapons, 1980s

Following the report by the former UN war crimes investigator, Sir Desmond da Silva, into the 1989 assassination of the Irish human rights lawyer Pat Finucane by British terrorists under the control of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the former British paramilitary police force in the North of Ireland, a greater focus in now on those behind Britain’s “Dirty War” in Ireland.

The veteran Irish journalist Ed Moloney, with his colleague Bob Mitchell, has presented over on his blog, The Broken Elbow, a fascinating analysis of Britain’s intelligence struggle in Ireland by placing it in the historical context of the 1919-1923 Irish War of Independence and the 1966-2007 Northern War. In the lengthy article the two writers tie together all the known information about Britain’s secret armies in Ireland, notably the notorious Force Research Unit (or FRU), and names and shames several leading members. He also highlights some startling links between the FRU and a previous generation of British spies and assassins in Ireland, the so-called “Cairo Gang” who operated in 1920s’ Dublin during the height of the Irish Revolution.

The Force Research Unit (FRU) - Britain's notorious death squad in Ireland during the Northern War, c.1982

The Force Research Unit (FRU) – Britain’s notorious death squad in Ireland during the Northern War, c.1982

Britain's death squads in Ireland - will justice ever catch up with the killers?

Britain’s death squads in Ireland – will justice ever catch up with the killers?

 

Pat Finucane – A Victim Of Britain’s State-Sponsored Terrorism In Ireland

A memorial to Pat Finucane, the Irish human rights lawyer assassinated by British state-sponsored terrorists in the Occupied North of Ireland, 1989

A memorial to Pat Finucane, the Irish human rights lawyer assassinated by British state-sponsored terrorists in the Occupied North of Ireland, 1989

On the 12th of Februaray 1989 the respected Irish civil rights lawyer Pat Finucane was sitting down to a Sunday dinner in his north Belfast home with his wife Geraldine and their three young children. Pat was a northern Roman Catholic from a large working-class Nationalist family and Geraldine a northern Protestant from a middle-class Unionist background both of whom had met and fallen in love while attending Trinity College in Dublin. Suddenly there was a hammering at the front door of the house as two masked gunmen used a sledge-hammer to smash their way in. Both men were members of the Ulster Freedom Fighters (or UFF), the largest British state-sponsored terrorist group in Ireland which operated under the legal cover of a militant Unionist group known as the UDA which the British government refused to declare illegal until 1992, two decades after it began a campaign of terrorism against the Irish people.

Pat and his wife rose from the table but as he stepped into the doorway of the kitchen a series of loud bangs rang out. The impact of two bullets striking his torso slammed the 39 year old father of three back into the room and he dropped helpless to the floor as Geraldine, also wounded, fell into an adjacent corner of the kitchen. As the screaming children, two boys and a girl, scrambled under the table to hide themselves the British terrorists rushed forward firing a total of twelve rounds into Pat’s face at almost point blank range from a Browning 9mm automatic pistol taken or supplied by the British Army, rendering his head virtually unrecognisable. The gunmen then ran from the house leaving the slain lawyer, his injured wife and traumatised children behind lying in a pool of blood and gun smoke.

Within hours of Pat Finucane’s death political and media circles in Belfast and Dublin were awash with rumours and accusations of British state involvement. The speedy declaration by the UFF that they had murdered the lawyer simply added to the rumour-mill, as the terror-gang’s role in Britain’s counter-insurgency war in Ireland was common knowledge. Soon the lengthy record of death threats against Pat by members of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC), the notorious paramilitary police force the British government later agreed to disband as part of the Peace Process, became known.

After years of high-profile scandals the pressure from human rights groups (including Amnesty International), the government of Ireland, the United States’ Congress and other International partners, forced the British state in 2001 to arrest and try a suspect for the killing, one William Stobie. This former British soldier was already known to be a UFF armourer and supplier of weapons but he was also revealed as an agent of the RUC liaising within the UFF on their behalf. His eventual trial for participating in Pat Finucane’s murder collapsed in chaos and embittered by the process he pledged to publicly name the RUC police officers behind the UFF terror campaign. Within months he was dead, shot down outside his home in December of 2011 before he could give any further details. Various British terrorist factions claimed credit for his assassination though many questioned the true identity of his killers.

Nick Greger, a leading British fascist, poses with the infamous Johnny Adair, a former senior British terrorist with the UDA-UFF terror group

Nick Greger, a leading British fascist, poses with the infamous Johnny Adair, a former senior British terrorist with the UDA-UFF terror group

In contrast a second man suspected of involvement in the killing, the infamous British terrorist Johnny “Mad Dog” Adair, managed to escape arrest for the murder despite evidence of his participation. Adair, a former skinhead and Neo-Nazi who boasted of deriving sexual pleasure from killing Irish men and women, fled to Britain in 2003 as his opposition to the Peace Process and push to control the lucrative drugs trade in the north-east of Ireland led to internecine warfare amongst the British terror gangs. There he became a close associate of a number of Far Right extremists, including leaders of the National Front, Combat 18 and the BNP. However before his exile a British government investigation by the London Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens revealed that Adair had become close friends in the 1990s with the then head of British Army Intelligence in the North of Ireland. Through this relationship British Intelligence officers passed on dozens of files to the Unionist death squads, as well as weapons and financial ”assistance”. For many years after fleeing Ireland, despite no employment or visible means of income, Adair and his family continued to live in relative affluence and safety in Britain.

A third suspect, Ken Barrett, was arrested and charged in 2004 for the murder of Pat, some fifteen years after the assassination. However the PR disaster for the British state deepened when it was revealed that Barrett was a former RUC police officer and another serving agent of the RUC in the UFF terror group. His previous open boasts to the media of having been directed and assisted by the paramilitary police in the murder only added to the British government’s woes. In 2006, after serving just two years of a 22 year sentence for Pat’s murder, Barrett was released from prison in the North of Ireland and immediately travelled to an unknown destination in Britain.

But now it seems that one of the darker episodes of Britain’s “Dirty War” is being brought a little further into the light after a bilateral agreement between Ireland and Britain forced the British government to initiate and publicise the findings of a new report by an internal investigative panel led by Sir Desmond de Silva, a former United Nations’ war crimes investigator.

Though, as will be seen, the report still manages to conceal more than it reveals.

Joint footpatrol of British UDA terrorists and British Army soldiers, British Occupied North of Ireland, 1970s

Joint footpatrol of British UDA terrorists and British Army soldiers, British Occupied North of Ireland, 1970

The key conclusions include the following acknowledgements:

  • There was a continuous supply of information from the British state to the British terrorist groups in the North of Ireland over a period of many years. In fact, concludes the report, by the mid-1980s up to 85% of all intelligence information gathered by the UFF / UDA alone was supplied to them by the RUC, British Army and the British Security Service (MI5).
  • The British authorities took no action in relation to numerous intelligence reports which outlined a number of future terrorist attacks by the Unionist gangs, with the paramilitary police and Intelligence services ignoring or concealing such information.
  • British agents employed or working on behalf of the RUC, British Army and MI5 played “key roles” and actively “furthered and facilitated” the murder of Pat Finucane and others.
  • Following the murder there were no attempts by the RUC or British authorities for a long period of time to investigate or arrest known suspects belonging to the UFF / UDA for their participation in the assassination.
  • Serving or former members of the RUC, British Army and MI5 Army persistently lied or attempted to deceive investigators. Several senior British Army officers provided  highly misleading and inaccurate information.

From RTÉ:

“A review into the murder of Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane in 1989 has found that actions by employees of the British state “actively facilitated” the killing.

Mr Finucane was shot dead by loyalists [British terrorists] in front of his wife and children in February 1989.The report by Desmond de Silva concluded that there was no “adequate framework” for the police and security forces running agents in loyalist and republican gangs.

Mr de Silva said people whom the RUC Special Branch viewed as “thorns in the side” were not warned when threats were made against them.

It found that the British army and Special Branch had advance notice of a series of planned UDA [UFF] assassinations, but nothing was done.

Mr de Silva found that employees of the state and stage agents played “key roles” in Mr Finucane’s murder.

Mr de Silva said “agents of the state were involved in carrying out serious violations of human rights up to and including murder”.

He wrote that while there was no “over-arching state conspiracy to murder Patrick Finucane,” there was collusion in his killing in terms of the passage of information from members of the security forces to the UDA, the failure to act on threat intelligence, the participation of state agents in the murder and the subsequent failure to investigate and arrest key members of the West Belfast UDA.

The publication of a report provides “the fullest possible account of the murder of Mr Finucane and the extent of state collusion”, British Prime Minister David Cameron said.

He added: “It cannot be argued that these were rogue agents.”He said the degree of collusion exposed was “unacceptable” and said in a message to the family: “I am deeply sorry.” Last Sunday, RTÉ News published details of a 2003 inquiry which showed the RUC had recovered the murder weapon and gave it back to the British army to facilitate its destruction.”

The government of Ireland, whose constitutional duty is to protect the life and property of the citizens of Ireland, has pledged to push for a full independent and international enquiry into the assassination, as also outlined by RTÉ:

“Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore has told the Dáil that the Government will continue to call for a public inquiry into the murder of Pat Finucane.

Mr Gilmore said that Mr Finucane’s widow Geraldine has worked tirelessly on uncovering the truth in her husband’s murder.

The Tánaiste said British Prime Minister David Cameron had shown determination to get to the truth and that his apology to Mrs Finucane followed on from his apology in the wake of the Lord Saville Inquiry.

He gave credit to the acknowledgement by Mr Cameron of the systematic failures in the murder inquiry.

He said that an inquiry need not be open-ended but could be done in a timely fashion.

The Finucane family have said “the dirt has been swept under the carpet” and described today’s report as a sham and a whitewash.

The family said the worst thing about the Desmond de Silva report is that it is a “suppression of the truth”.

The family again called for a public inquiry, and said the case was the “most controversial”, demonstrated the most state collusion and was a case the British “state had most to hide”.

PSNI Chief Constable Matt Baggott is to discuss the de Silva report with the Police Ombudsman and the Public Prosecution Service to see if more people should be held to account for the murder of the solicitor.

He said: “The murder should never have happened. There was a catalogue of failure which needs to be assessed to see if people should be held accountable.”

In a statement, Taoiseach Enda Kenny said the de Silva report and David Cameron’s statement acknowledge the “shocking extent of state collusion in the murder of Pat Finucane and the efforts to subvert and frustrate subsequent investigations into that murder”.

He welcomed Mr Cameron’s “clear condemnation of the nature and scale of collusion, and his firm public apology to Geraldine Finucane and her family for all they have endured”.

He continued: “I note that the Prime Minister has indicated that various authorities in Britain and in Northern Ireland are expected to consider the report.”The murder of Pat Finucane was one of a number of cases which gave rise to allegations of collusion by the security forces.

It is a matter of public record that the Irish Government disagrees strongly with the decision by the British government last year not to conduct a public inquiry into the murder of Pat Finucane.

Mr Kenny said the Government’s position “has consistently been in accordance with the all-party motion adopted in the Dáil in 2006 which called for a full, independent, public enquiry, as recommended by Judge Cory.”That position is unchanged”, he said.

He said the Government has also supported the Finucane family in their efforts “to ascertain the full extent of collusion behind Pat Finucane’s murder and the subsequent investigations”.

Mr Kenny said he spoke with Mr Cameron this morning before the House of Commons statement, and repeated these points to him once again.

He said he had also spoken to Mrs Finucane today, adding that he knows the family are not satisfied with today’s outcome.”

Of course, despite all the evidence presented, some people are still prepared, eager even, to defend or excuse away the murder of an Irish citizen and a member of the Irish legal profession. Can there be anything more degenerate than the perverse views of the Neo-Unionist apologist historian Ruth Dudley Edwards in the Telegraph?

“…let’s bust the myth that Finucane was a human-rights lawyer.  A human-rights lawyer is someone who disinterestedly protects people from abuse by the state or by terrorists.  Pat Finucane didn’t do that.  He was an IRA lawyer who worked for terrorists against the interests of justice.

The early 1970s in Northern Ireland were terrible times that pushed towards violence many who in a normal world would have led peaceful lives.  Finucane was one of those.  Although Northern Irish, at the expense of the British taxpayer, he studied law at Trinity College, Dublin.

After his death he was canonised by republican propagandists and turned retrospectively into a human-rights lawyer.  It turns my stomach that this man was murdered, that members of the security forces colluded with it and that the murder was carried out in front of his family.   But journalists and commentators should not carelessly adopt the language of propagandists.  Finucane was a lawyer who was a faithful servant of a terrorist group that carried out in his lifetime many hundreds of vicious murders that he himself condoned.

The British state has admitted its wrongdoing.  It’s time to close the book on Pat Finucane.”

Anglophone Propaganda And The British Press

Defnyddiwch eich Cymraeg - Use your Welsh!

Defnyddiwch eich Cymraeg – Use your Welsh!

Well that didn’t take long. Barely a week has passed since the right-wing British news media carried a series of anonymous and unverifiable claims about a Welsh-medium school in Wales acting in a discriminatory manner towards English-speaking pupils when we now have yet another fantastical allegation of “anti-English bias” in the Welsh education system. Is there an anglophone black propaganda unit turning this nonsense out on a regular basis?

According to claims made in the conservative Express newspaper:

“A HEAD teacher was accused of “living in the Dark Ages” yesterday after warning that children caught speaking English in his Welsh school faced expulsion.

The punishment is part of a system to “monitor, congratulate and discipline pupils in their use of Welsh”, claims Huw Foster Evans.

He has told parents of any youngster who continues to speak in English to a member of staff after receiving two warnings that they will be “invited to the school to discuss their child’s future”.

If pupils speak English in class they will lose their free time while if they are caught doing so in corridors or the playground they will be reprimanded.

The controversial rules have been spelled out in a letter to parents of all 800 pupils at Ysgol Morgan Llwyd ­secondary school in Wrexham, North Wales.”

What the journalist fails to make clear is that the increasingly popular Ysgol Morgan Llwyd is the one and only secondary school in the local area that teaches all classes through the Welsh language. It is attended by children whose indigenous language is Welsh or children whose first language is English but whose parents wish them to become fluent in Welsh. Furthermore, the article also fails to point out that there are several English-medium schools available in the locality that teach pupils entirely through the English language.

As the school principal Foster Evans makes clear:

““We enjoy the strong support of the vast majority of pupils and carers who share with us a positive focus on the learning, achievement and personal development of pupils through the medium of Welsh.

Fluency in Welsh is an absolute requirement to enable our students to attain their full potential.

The only way to develop increasing fluency in any language is to speak it as regularly as possible.”

So, another invented or exaggerated non-story about alleged bias against English-speaking schoolchildren in Wales. The real story in fact is that such patently false claims are being made and that they are being given such prominence in the British anglophone nationalist press. As I said before, the culture war in Wales is heating up.

Beating Drums Instead Of Burning Crosses, Orange Sashes Instead Of White Hoods

British Nationalism In Ireland – Racism And Sectarianism As The Orange Order Identifies With The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) – One Reflection Of British Anti-Irishness

A few readers have contacted me asking why no post on the Ulster Covenant centenary march held in Belfast on Saturday. A fair question, I suppose, but what is there left to be said?

What can one say about a parade held to commemorate the early 20th century armed rebellion by the British ethnic minority on the island of Ireland against the clear and democratic wishes of the majority of the country’s inhabitants for some form of independence, whether limited Home Rule within the so-called United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Dominion Rule within the British Empire or a sovereign Irish Republic separate from both? Over 80-85% of the Irish people desired a new constitutional arrangement with Britain, with far greater autonomy for Ireland. Judging by later electoral results, both national and local, its likely that at least 60% of the population of the island favoured complete independence in the form of a republic. Yet 15-20% of the population, through violence and the threat of violence, attempted to thwart any and all political moves away from a regime of British colonial rule.

And why? Because they regarded themselves as Ireland’s British colonial elite, in their minds the God-given rightful rulers of the island of Ireland. Superior in language, culture, religion and ethnicity. Superior in race. Because they and their ancestors were British, and the natives Irish.

And still it goes on.

Orange Order bands and similar echoing their Lambeg drums down the narrow streets of Ireland proclaiming the superiority, the greatness, of those who follow them. Warning the inferior natives, the lowly indigenous, to bide their place, to bow and scrape and give thanks for the British civilization that permits their continued existence. Beating drums instead of burning crosses, orange sashes instead of white hoods, screaming bandsmen instead of howling lynchmobs.

Stephen Moore, BNP activist, Nick Griffin, BNP leader, and Rev. Robert West at Ulster Covenant centenary parade, North of Ireland, 2012 (Photo: Bangordub)

The truth is self-evident. The heart of Unionist culture, of British culture, in Ireland is poisoned by a triple infection of sectarianism, racism and colonialism. Nick Griffin, the leader of the far right Neo-Nazi British National Party or BNP, knows that all too well which is why he attended the Ulster Covenant “celebrations”  at Stormont along with his fellow travellers. His comment on the day came to us via Twitter:

“So Ulster pics have upset my republican stalkers. Tell you what, the bodhran can’t match the lambeg, you Fenian bastards.”

Nick Griffin, British far right BNP leader, and his Fenian Bastards tweet

Meanwhile the supporters of the British murder gangs, the terrorists who began decades of renewed conflict in response to a rising civil rights movement from the “natives” during the mid and late 1960s, had their day too selling UDA, UFF and UVF merchandise to the eager crowds of law-abiding Unionists.

British terrorist merchandise for sale, the Ulster Covenant centenary rally 2012 – finance a gunman near you (Photo: Squinter)

Ah yes, British and Unionist anti-democrats, fascists, racists, colonial supremacists and terrorists. A day worthy of celebration.

Ulster Resistance – Unapologetic British Terrorism In Ireland

Joint footpatrol of British UDA terrorists and British Army soldiers, British Occupied North of Ireland, 1970s

The Seeds Of The Northern War

We’ve seen a lot of outraged (and outrageous) speeches in recent days from politicians representing the British Unionist minority in the north-east of Ireland demanding an “apology” from the government of Ireland for its alleged role in fostering the divisions in the Irish Republican Army in the late 1960s that led to the establishment of the breakaway Provisional Army Council in December of 1969. Some Unionists claim that the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) was the direct result of Irish government policies in relation to the growing conflict in the British Occupied North of Ireland and an attempt to arm and direct a growing anti-British insurgency in the period from 1969 to 1970. In fact, of course, the conflict began many years earlier in 1966 when attacks by British terrorist gangs on Irish communities across the northern part of Ireland led to several deaths and injuries, and the destruction of property north and south of the border. The oldest victim was 74 year old Matilda Gould, a Protestant grandmother murdered by “mistake”, while the youngest was Peter Ward, an 18 year old teenage boy gunned down with two others. The violence was the work of the Ulster Volunteer Force or UVF which was led by several ex-members of the British Armed Forces who had earlier been active with a local anti-Irish and anti-Catholic vigilante group founded in 1956 called the Ulster Protestant Association. That organisation’s most famous member was the Reverend Ian Paisley, a firebrand fundamentalist preacher who founded his own Christian sect, the Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster, in 1951.

One unexpected side-effect of this intermittent Unionist reign of terror was the burgeoning Civil Rights movement by Roman Catholics opposed to the apartheid-state of “Northern Ireland” established by the British through the partition of the island of Ireland in the 1920s (the movement itself drew inspiration from contemporary organisations in White-ruled South Africa and the southern United States). In the form of “Northern Ireland” the British colony in Ireland had been shrunk down to a microcosm of itself but with all the worse aspect of British colonial rule in the country given renewed impetus as the British Unionist and mainly Protestant population attempted to sustain their position as an unassailable colonial elite. Under continuous one-party Unionist rule the north-eastern part of the country became synonymous with a police state, a dictatorial regime hiding behind a paper-thin façade of gerrymandered democracy and selective rule of law.

By the late 1960s and early 1970s this quasi-colony of Britain perched on the edge of Europe could no longer be sustained – or defended. The Unionist regime at Stormont implemented draconian measure after measure to smash the Civil Rights organisations, principally through the actions of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (the RUC, a paramilitary police force drawn exclusively from the Unionist population) and various related armed militias, official and unofficial. The latter were more numerous, including the Ulster Volunteer Force and other shadowy groups whose record of state-sponsored terrorism on behalf of the Unionist statelet in Ireland and of Britain itself was unparalleled in post-WWII European history until the ferocity of the Balkan wars in the 1990s.

It is in this context that we must place the ideological and policy divisions of the Irish Republican movement in Ireland during the 1960s and early ‘70s and the emergence of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (or more correctly simply the Irish Republican Army) as the prime insurgent force opposing the continued British Occupation. The IRA, “Provisionals” or “Provos”, were in the beginning little more than a community self-defence force, protecting the Irish civilian population of the North of Ireland from attacks by the Unionist and British state during the suppression of the Civil Rights’ movement. Ill-armed, ill-equipped, lacking in organisation and training, a loose group of serving and former IRA Volunteers formed the core of the organisation. Many were aged veterans, whose military careers dated to the 1940s or ‘50s. Around them coalesced others, mostly raw recruits, teenagers doing the unthinkable and defying the Stormont regime and the community it represented after decades of servility. What little support came from “the south”, be it governmental or personal, was barely sufficient to meet the ongoing crisis. As Unionist mobs, with the connivance or encouragement of Stormont ministers and the RUC paramilitary police, swept through Nationalists communities implementing the old tactic of “pogrom” (what today is better known as “ethnic cleansing”), thousands fled across the border into temporary refugee camps set up by the Irish government and Red Cross. In Belfast and elsewhere entire streets went up in flames, the perpetrators often being serving police officers or local members of the British military.

It is hardly surprising then that the government of Ireland, with a constitutional, legal and moral duty to protect its citizens, did what it could to help the hundreds of thousands of Irish citizens trapped in the collective dictatorship of “Northern Ireland”. Despite the clams of Unionists, and their fellow travellers in Britain, it is clear that there was no attempt by Dublin to organise an armed resistance to the British Occupation or to force a British withdrawal by military means. Instead such direct efforts as were made were entirely aimed towards the self-defence of besieged Irish communities – and at a time when the British forces of law and order in the North of Ireland were on a murderous rampage throughout the region. Even the deployment of the British Armed Forces did little to halt this orgy of Unionist destruction. As quickly became apparent to all, the British Army was there to defend the last remnants of the British colony in Ireland in whatever form it took  – not to keep the peace or oversee its reform. Within weeks of deployment the British military were on the attack, terrorising the Irish populace alongside the existing British Unionist organs of terror, be they the RUC or UVF. Nothing had changed. Instead of peaceful progress towards mutual agreement between both communities in the North of Ireland and between the two nations of Ireland and Britain, what occurred was a reigniting of the Irish War of Independence in the north-east of the country and Britain’s counter-insurgency response. It was a return to the default setting for the British in Ireland: defend the British colony and the British colonists at all costs.

Peter Robinson caught on camera in late 1984 during a visit to the Israel-Lebanon border with an automatic assault rifle

The Formation Of The Ulster Resistance

In this historic setting must be placed the actions of British Unionist politicians in the 1980s when the governments of Ireland and Britain, in the aftermath of the Hunger Strikes and the growing political power of the Irish insurgency (and the reluctant realisation by the British that their war in Ireland could not be won), signed an international treaty to normalise relations between both states and facilitate progress towards a peaceful political settlement in the North. The Anglo-Irish Agreement of November 15th 1985 saw Britain tacitly secede a portion of its sovereignty over “Northern Ireland” to Ireland by accepting Irish input into its administration as the “guarantor” of the Irish populace of the region. From then on Irish civil servants would have an advisory role in the North of Ireland through various inter-governmental bodies and a permanent secretariat based outside Belfast.

This attempt by both governments to lay the groundwork for eventual peace caused outrage amongst the local British Unionist population which responded with a year-long series of political and violent protests and a renewed campaign of murder by the British terror gangs. At this time the frayed relationship that had developed over the previous decade between the RUC paramilitary police and Unionist terrorist groups was patched up and given a new momentum, as both reflected the opposition within their community to the Anglo-Irish détente. Similarly Britain’s Intelligence services, principally the Security Service (better known by the acronym MI5) and its various military equivalents stepped up their support for Unionist terrorist organisations as many within the British state expressed outrage at the perceived “surrender” to Irish Nationalism.

On the 10th of November 1986 many of these forces of opposition came together in the Ulster Hall in Belfast where 3000 delegates attended a by-invite-only meeting. Amongst those organising  the gathering were the leaders of the Democratic Unionist Party (or DUP) including the Reverend Ian Paisley, Peter Robinson and Reverend Ivan Foster (who were all members or clergymen of Paisley’s self-styled Free Presbyterian Church of Ulster). Paisley and Foster had been founders in 1981 of a previous Unionist militia, the Third Force, and Foster had a long history as a pastoral figure in the Free Presbyterian congregation, presiding at the funerals of several slain Unionist terrorists who belonged to it. Peter Robinson had earlier in the year established his militant credentials when on the 7th of August 1986 he led 500 members of the Third Force in an invasion of the small Irish village of Clontibret in County Monaghan, across the border. During the incursion, which terrified the inhabitants, the local station of the Gardaí (the unarmed, Irish civilian police service) was attacked, two Gardaí were surrounded and badly beaten, and a military parade was held on the main street. The invasion was only repulsed when Garda reinforcements arrived, the gangs fleeing back across the border during which a number of shots were fired. These actions made Robinson a hero in Unionist circles and he remained a central figure in militant Unionism in the years that were to follow. Another leading attendee in the Ulster Hall was Alan Wright, the Chairman of the Ulster Clubs, a quasi-paramilitary organisation founded in November 1985 that shared considerable cross-membership with the Third Force.

During the meeting a new organisation was unveiled by Ian Paisley, the Ulster Resistance, a paramilitary army to oppose the Anglo-Irish Agreement and any further attempts to resolve the northern conflict through negotiations between both governments and communities. Paisley and his deputy, Peter Robinson, were later photographed in the distinctive Ulster Resistance red berets, and Robinson in camouflage fatigues as well. The Ulster Resistance quickly subsumed other previous groupings, including the Third Force and Ulster Clubs, forming itself into nine battalions, and established informal links with the existing British terrorist organisations in Ireland, principally the banned Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) and the then still legal Ulster Defence Association or UDA (this large grouping used the title of the Ulster Freedom Fighters or UFF for its terrorist attacks, which led to repeated calls for its banning by the International community which the British government steadfastly refused until August of 1992 – after 22 years of terrorism).

Peter Robinson leads Ulster Resistance militants in a rally, British Occupied North of Ireland, 1987, including Noel Little, UDA terrorist and arms smuggler

Arms Smuggling From Lebanon

In June of 1987 the UVF staged an armed robbery at the Northern Bank in Portadown which netted the organisation in excess of 300,000 pounds sterling. The money was then added to funds gathered by the UDA and Ulster Resistance from various criminal activities and donations from Unionist businessmen and community leaders to purchase arms from a black-market weapons-dealer in the Middle East which arrived at Belfast docks in December 1987 in crates marked as containing ceramic tiles after a long sea voyage from the Lebanon. Though the exact quantity and types of weapons imported are unknown sources give the following lower estimates:

  • Over 200 Czech-made VZ.58 automatic assault rifles
  • 94 Browning 9mm automatic pistols
  • 12 or more RPG-7 anti-armour rocket launchers and between 60 – 150 warheads
  • 400 – 500 RGD-5 fragmentation grenades
  • Over 30,000 rounds of assorted ammunition

The masterminds behind this arms smuggling operation were not the leaders of the British terrorist movements in Ireland. Instead the inspiration and drive came from Brian Nelson, a former British soldier turned senior UDA terrorist who was also an agent acting on behalf of the Force Research Unit, a secret group operating within the British Army’s Intelligence Corps. Co-operating with the Security Service (MI5) both organisations wished to derail the Anglo-Irish Agreement and the increasingly friendly relations between Dublin and London by strengthening the counter-insurgency campaign of their Unionist paramilitary proxies.

The Czech-made VZ.58 automatic assault rifle imported by British Intelligence to arm British terrorists in Ireland

Through Nelson it was the Security Service that had put the UDA in contact with arms-smuggling networks in the Middle East, which up to then had been quite beyond their capabilities (and ever since). These included organising meetings between the UDA and the Apartheid-era South African National Intelligence Service (NIS) and its associate in the region, the American-born arms-dealer Douglas Berndhart, who also worked for the South African arms industry. Berndhart organised the supply of the weapons for the Unionists through a Lebanese gunrunner named Joe Fawzi, the arms coming from PLO stocks that had been captured by the Lebanese Christian Phalangist militias when Palestinian guerrillas had been expelled from south Lebanon in 1982 following the Israeli invasion. Berndhart was in close contact with the Israeli intelligence services, whose allies were the Christian militias, at a time when South Africa and Israel regularly traded arms technologies and security information. In fact much of the smuggled weapons had been sold on to South Africa by the Israelis for use in its border wars with its African neighbours. This has led to the obvious conclusion that the Israelis must have given the go-ahead for the shipments despite deteriorating relations between the two countries at a governmental level in the late ‘80s.

The munitions imported from Lebanon were transported to a rural location between Armagh and Portadown to be stored and later distributed to the UVF, UFF and Ulster Resistance. On the 8th of January 1988 part of the UDA’s share was unexpectedly intercepted by a Royal Ulster Constabulary checkpoint during transport from Portadown to Belfast in a convoy of three cars. 61 assault rifles, 30 handguns, 150 grenades and over 11,000 rounds of ammunition were seized and three UDA men arrested. Davy Payne, the UDA’s North Belfast leader and another former British soldier (a paratrooper), was later sentenced to 19 years in prison and the two others to 14 years each. An Ulster Resistance member, Noel Little, a former British Army soldier (in the notorious Ulster Defence Regiment or UDR) and the Armagh chairman of the Ulster Clubs was arrested in connection with the find but later released without charge.

Subsequently rumours circulated in Unionist terror circles that the three car-loads of weapons had been “sacrificed” in order to allow larger consignments to get through, a deliberate act of misdirection to distract those RUC factions who disagreed with the rearming of Unionist paramilitary gangs. Others pointed towards long-standing rivalries within the British Intelligence community over government policy in Ireland, and the possibility that the British Secret Intelligence Service (commonly known as MI6) had leaked what they knew of the smuggling operation to contacts within the RUC. Certainly it later emerged that the British navy had been tracking the smuggling vessel in the Mediterranean but had somehow mysteriously “lost” it en route to Ireland in circumstances that have never been explained.

In February of 1988 another part of the UDA’s weapons store was uncovered in North Belfast with the recovery of an RPG7 rocket launcher and 26 warheads, 38 assault rifles, 15 handguns, 100 grenades and an unprecedented 40,000 rounds of ammunition by the RUC.

The Ulster Resistance’s share of the munitions was discovered in November of that year by RUC searches at a number of locations in County Armagh. In a large haul of military equipment the RUC found an RPG7 rocket launcher and 5 warheads, 3 assault rifles, an automatic pistol, 10 grenades, 12,000 rounds of ammunition, combat uniforms and other items including Ulster Resistance berets and badges. Unexpectedly components of a British-made Javelin surface-to-air missile (SAM) were also found. These had been stolen in October from the Short Brothers factory in Belfast where they were produced and which had an entirely Unionist workforce. The parts consisted of a detailed model of the missile’s aiming system facilitating copying by competitors. It quickly emerged that the technology had been stolen by Ulster Resistance activists as part of the “payment” to South Africa for the supply of weapons and ammunition to the Unionist terror gangs.

At this time the South Africans were under an international arms embargo over the issue of Apartheid and White Minority rule which had led the country to developing its own indigenous arms industry in the guise of the Armaments Corporation of South Africa (Armscor) which had very close ties to similar companies in Israel. Dick Wright, an employee of Armscor, was an uncle of Alan Wright, the leader of the Ulster Clubs and a co-founder with Ian Paisley of the Ulster Resistance. He had met the leadership of the UDA in east Belfast during a visit home to Ireland in 1985 and made an offer of arms from South Africa in return for money or British missile technology from the Shorts armaments factory in Belfast. The UDA boss John McMichael instructed Brian Nelson to travel to South Africa in 1985 where he was taken to a warehouse in Johannesburg filled with weaponry that could be supplied to the UDA in return for it’s co-operation in smuggling out of the North of Ireland British munitions’ technology for the Apartheid regime.

A second two-week trip by Nelson in June of 1987, following the fund-raising bank robbery, sealed the deal. During it Unionists agreed to use their own money to part-pay for the initial purchase and smuggling of the arms, with stolen missile parts or blueprints paying for the rest. The South Africans agreed to sell the first round of armaments at less than half-price, with an agreement to supply more weapons for free and up to one million pounds sterling to fund an intensified British terrorist campaign in Ireland if all went as planned. Due to the persistent work of dedicated journalists and lawyers it later emerged, incredibly, that the British Ministry of Defence had paid for Nelson’s South African trips at the request of British Military Intelligence.

During 1988 a technical officer at the South African embassy in Paris, which was now “handling” the UDA and Ulster Resistance contacts, arranged for three Unionist terrorists to receive arms training in France, including the use of the RPG-7 anti-armour rocket-launchers. During the course of renewed negotiations the South Africans offered to pay several million pounds sterling for access to the newest and most advanced British missile system, Starstreak, as well as more weapons. At least 50,000 pounds was handed over as a down-payment on this.

In early April of 1989 parts of a Blowpipe missile went missing and another was stolen from a British Army base in Newtownards. Subsequently three members of the UDA, Noel Little, previously arrested in connection with the 1987 importation of arms (and photographed with Peter Robinson in Ulster Resistance uniform), James King (like Little a member of Paisley’s Free Presbyterian Church and DUP party) and Samuel Quinn, a British Army sergeant and weapons’ instructor at the Newtownards military base, were arrested at the Hilton Hotel in Paris on the 21st of April 1989 along with a diplomat from South Africa, Daniel Storm, and the agent and arms dealer, Douglas Bernhart, by the then French security service DST. French police recovered various missile parts, most of which seemed to be non-functioning.

The three Unionists were charged with arms trafficking and associating with criminals involved in terrorist activities, while several South African embassy officials were expelled by the French authorities. In October 1991 after more than two years on remand the three were convicted though they received suspended sentences and fines following representations on their behalf by British Intelligence officials to their French counterparts.

In September of 1989 a 33 year old man from Poyntzpass and a 35 year old man from Tandragee were jailed for storing and moving weapons and explosives on behalf of the Ulster Resistance. In January 1990 a 32 year old former British Army soldier (another ex-UDR militiaman) from Richill was jailed for 12 years for possessing Ulster Resistance arms and explosives.

Shortly afterwards, as the political pressure mounted on the DUP, Ian Paisley issued a statement claiming that his party had severed links with the Ulster Resistance in 1987, news that took many observers by surprise.

Ian Paisley in an Ulster Resistance beret at a rally, British Occupied North of Ireland, 1987

The Ulster Resistance – It Hasn’t Gone Away You Know 

To this day up to a third of the South African-supplied arms imported by the British Intelligence services into the north-east of Ireland remain unaccounted for. In particular it is thought that the majority of Ulster Resistance weapons and ammunition were turned over to the UDA and UVF in the early 1990s in the lead-up to the first IRA ceasefire of 1994 when Unionist terrorist killings of Irish civilians reached levels not seen since the early 1970s. Many of these weapons are thought to have been excluded from the so-called Decommissioning Process. There are also strong suspicions that smaller quantities of munitions were smuggled into the North via South African contacts the details of which remain unknown.

What is known is that the South Africans were also using the Unionist terror gangs in Ireland and Britain to target European-based anti-Apartheid activists in return for military equipment and funds. With their strong links to far right racist and Neo-Nazi groups in Britain, as well as the British state itself,  the UDA and UVF were perfect allies for the South African regime. Additionally throughout the 1950s, ’60s, ’80s and 1990s much of the British Unionist minority in Ireland had remained politically supportive of the White Minority governments in Zimbabwe and South Africa, seeing parallels with their own status in Ireland. Certainly all the main Unionist parties opposed economic and military sanctions against South Africa, including the international boycott, and championed various campaigns defending the Apartheid regime. The significant ex-pat Unionist population in the country, some of whom served in the government or security forces, also created a strong basis for a mutual alliance.

By the early 1980s the South African Intelligence services were also aware of the close relationship between Sinn Féin and the African National Congress (or ANC). In the late 1970s the ANC’s leadership had instructed activists living in Ireland to request Sinn Féin’s help in contacting the Irish Republican Army, seeking military assistance and advice. Eventually it was arranged for two field commanders of the guerilla organisation Umkhonto we Sizwe (better known as MK) to travel to Dublin where they received two weeks of intensive military training from the IRA in a secret camp. These men travelled back to South Africa where they crossed over the border into Angola to impart their skills to new and existing MK fighters.

In the latter half of 1979 senior members of MK suggested an idea that would eventually become one of the highest profile operations in the struggle against White Minority rule. The plan was to sabotage the massive oil refinery run by the company Sasol which was vital to the economic existence of the Apartheid state. Unsure of the best way to go about such an elaborate attack MK again requested IRA assistance and in 1980 two munitions experts travelled from Ireland to Sasolburg in the ironically named Free State Province to reconnoitre the site. In June of that year the attack took place and though the regime immediately issued statements claiming the resulting damage was minimal few believed it, providing an enormous propaganda boost to both MK and the ANC.

It is not unreasonable to suggest that a fear of continued IRA assistance to MK and the ANC was one of the reasons why the South Africans reached out to the British terror gangs in Ireland. The possibility of causing chaos in the North of Ireland was probably one hoped outcome of the alliance with the UDA-UVF-UR axis, as well as striking back at the anti-Apartheid campaign in Europe.

This latter result can be seen in the attempted assassination of the South African-born Queen’s University lecturer, Dr Adrian Guelke. The 44-year-old academic was shot in the back, after UDA gunmen burst into his South Belfast home at around 4.30am on September 4th, 1991. The lecturer was an outspoken critic of the Apartheid dictatorship and it was later revealed that South African military intelligence had used details from a leaked RUC Special Branch file to make him a target for Unionist terrorists. The file had been supplied by the South African agent, Leon Flores, who flew to Belfast via London in the autumn of 1991, contacted the UDA, and provided its south Belfast brigade with the RUC intelligence report.

There are also rumours of Unionist involvement in the assassination of Dulcie September, a well known anti-Apartheid campaigner and ANC member, murdered by an unknown gunman outside the ANC offices in Paris on the 29th of March 1988.

An apology is certainly due in relation to the decades of politically-motivated pain and suffering the people of Ireland have endured. But it is the leaders of British Unionism in Ireland who need to make it. And their allies in Britain.

Recent photo of Ulster Resistance terrorists, one armed with a stripped-down British Army issued SA80 assault rifle

UPDATE 15.10.2012: The British Guardian newspaper carries yet another media exposé of Britain’s state-sponsored terrorism in Ireland and the South African arms importations.

British Supremacism In Ireland

Anti-Irish extremists from the British separatist minority in Ireland parading outside a Roman Catholic Church, Belfast, Occupied North of Ireland, 2012 (Photo: The Five Demands)

The British separatist minority in Ireland doing what the British separatist minority does best: terrorising and intimidating other communities while expressing the supremacist attitudes of a colonial elite. From Chris Donnelly over on Slugger O’Toole:

“1. Loyalist bands, along with Loyal Order representatives and unionist politicians –  including First Minister Peter Robinson - release a letter to the newspapers condemning the Parades Commission for action taken following an explicitly sectarian act by a [British terrorist] UVF-aligned Loyalist band on the 12th July outside of St Patrick’s Church on Donegall Street, Belfast. The sectarian action involved stopping to play a song described as ‘racist’ by a Scottish Court and which celebrates the death of one million Irish people during the Famine.

2. Loyalists assemble and are whipped into a frenzy by the City Grand Master at Clifton Street, who rips up the Parades Commission determination before the bands proceed towards St Patrick’s Church.

3. According to numerous accounts, virtually all (if not all) of the Loyalist bands breach the Parades Commission determination by playing music outside of the church, including the Sash.

4. In addition to the music, many of the loyalist supporters have been pictured stopping directly outside of the church and waving loyalist flags, dancing with [British] Union Flag umbrellas and/or making offensive gestures to the assembled protesters.

5. Known Loyalist paramilitary leaders – and Unionist politicians – accompany the UVF-aligned Young Conway Volunteers band past St Patrick’s Church, a direct breach of the Parades Commission ruling that the band be forbidden from taking this route.

6. Nigel Dodds releases a statement condemning republicans and the Parades Commission for causing the trouble. Seriously.”

A British terrorist-supporting band from the British Unionist minority in Ireland beating anti-Irish music outside a Roman Catholic Church, Belfast, Occupied North of Ireland, 2012 (Photo: The Five Demands)

For more information read the latest report over on the Five Demands (in Italian).

Lies, Dammed Lies And The Pro-British Regressives

The Royal Irish Constabulary or RIC, the British Empire’s colonial police force in Ireland

Rewriting Irish history?

That seems to be the main concern of the contemporary Pro-British faction in modern Ireland. These anachronistic, post-colonial throwbacks are currently engaged in a long-running campaign to rehabilitate the memory of the Royal Irish Constabulary or RIC, Britain’s paramilitary police force in Ireland during the colonial occupation.

Like the Far Right and Neo-Nazi revisionists in France who are trying to repackage the record of the the Vichy Regime and the infamous Milice française, the Neo-Unionist extreme here are engaged in the political whitewashing of our collective history and the attempted brainwashing of an entire generation of Irish people. A generation who will never know the ever-present fear of the RIC that our great-grandparents and those before them knew. Unless one was raised in the North of Ireland, where the RIC’s direct successor, the Royal Ulster Constabulary, continued to operate as Britain’s colonial enforcers in Ireland, the dread of the British terror machine is but a fact in the pages of a history book. Not the reality of everyday life.

An Irish family forced from their home by the Royal Irish Constabulary or RIC as their land is siezed by a British colonial landlord during the Land War, Ireland, 1879

This “revisionist” censorship is no more evident than in the columns of our national newspapers where the media elite, shaped by the views and politics of the British apologists amongst them, beat a steady drum roll of Neo-Unionist propaganda. From the Herald:

“THE 90th anniversary of the disbandment of the Dublin Metropolitan Police and Royal Irish Constabulary takes place this week.

Nearly 500 — mostly native Irishmen, Catholic and Protestant — were murdered during the War of Independence by the IRA, writes Gerry O’Carroll.

Some were shot dead as they left mass with their families, others ambushed while outnumbered.

But why does the State still refuse to recognise the men of the RIC and DMP who died in the War of Independence and 1916? Most were innocent policemen doing their duty.

Is it not time to honour those who gave their lives while serving to uphold the law, even if it was administered by a colonial British government?”

Innocent policemen? Innocent policemen who enforced, through violence and the threat of violence, British colonial rule in Ireland. Innocent policemen based in fortified barracks across our island nation, organised and trained in infantry formations and tactics, armed with revolvers and rifles, bribed with money and status, who garrisoned and terrorised entire communities. Innocent policemen who corrupted thousands of men, women and children, turning them into spies and informers in a web of treachery and deceit unknown outside of some Middle East dictatorship. As well celebrate the Stasi of the former East Germany or the Mukhabarat of Saddam Hussein.

And notice the terminology? “Murdered”. “Outnumbered”. What an utter distortion and abuse of history, of historical truths unpalatable to the Pro-British (pro-colonial?) mindset.

These people do not wish to simply rewrite Irish history. They wish to reverse it too.

Castle Catholics And Sham Irish – Journalism In Ireland

Dear Old Oirland Where The Oirish Doth Play

As regular readers of An Sionnach Fionn know (and it seems that there is quite a few of you) I have more than a little contempt for the media establishment in Ireland. Irish journalists, in the main, are every bit as culpable for the disastrous cronyism and corruption of the Irish political and social system over the last forty odd years as any of the main political parties. Point out to me the people in the Irish news media who challenged the hedonism and greed of the Celtic Tiger era. Who named and shamed the bankers and their political sockpuppets at the height of that venal decade? Few and far between, and some not without their own political agendas as infighting between the business mafias became proxy wars fought in the newspapers.

That is another thing about the Irish media elite. The faux nature of their supposed liberalism. In fact most are centre-right, free market capitalists, unreconstructed (and largely unapologetic) Celtic Tiger cubs who yearn for a return to the good old (bad old) days of coke and lattés. Few have any real sense of being Irish, of Ireland, instead they embrace a sham Anglo-American plastic Oirishness wrapped up in a contempt for all things indigenous to this island, anything that does not come to us via the mechanism of the English language and English culture. Celtic, Gaelic, Irish? No thanks. Give me the Big House, the Ascendancy and the fawning pride of being part of the Pax Britannica. There is an old term, “Castle Catholic”, pejorative though it is, that sums up much of the group-think in Ireland’s national media.

This article in the Irish Independent newspaper illustrates it rather nicely, as intrepid reporter Emily Hourican meets British author Jessica Douglas-Home, who discusses Lilah, youngest daughter of the 7th Viscount Powerscourt (meeting, discussing and thinking about the old Anglo-Irish aristos being something that sends the average Irish journo into paroxysms of orgasmic sycophancy):

…Jessica Douglas-Home asks: “I was warned that the Irish do not like the British Empire and all that we stood for then. Is that true?”

It’s an impossible question, particularly when asked by the great-granddaughter of Lord Powerscourt, while standing in the ballroom of Powerscourt House (it turns out that it’s pronounced ‘Prscrt’ by those in the know. Aristocrats seem to consider long vowel sounds much as we might consider rats).”

Hmm. I do believe I might have been able to supply a possible answer to that supposedly “impossible” question. Why Hourican’s inability to do so? Perhaps she’s come over all Irish R.M.? After all who could “like” the British Empire and all it stood for? Invasion, occupation, colonialism, servitude, exploitation, genocide? And what type of moron would ask the question in the first place? Especially of an Irish person. But then, I suppose, an assumed air of superiority is built into a certain type English robber-baron progeny.

“Jessica, an author, painter and theatre designer, has never visited the one-time family estate before. She was here to hang an exhibition of beautiful photos taken by her grandmother — Lilah Wingfield, youngest daughter of the seventh Viscount Powers-court, in India in 1911, a visual record of a remarkable trip.

…according to Jessica, the people of India still remember, with affection, the heyday of Empire.

“In Delhi they came to the exhibition of Lilah’s photographs in their hordes, with tears in their eyes. The people are grateful for the rule of law we established, the railways, the language, the education at the time was fantastic.”

Hence the question I cannot answer, about the reactions of Irish people to similar historic reminders. Jessica’s advance information, from friends living here, was not to expect a similar show of delight.”

Okay, so I’m not getting this. The British Empire was a VERY BAD THING? Yes? This is a given historical fact is it not? This is an Irish newspaper I’m reading not the British Daily Mail with its post-imperial fetish. Seriously, outside of some extreme right-wing British nationalist circles who on earth thinks that the British Empire was a good thing? Jessica Double-Barrell may well need to channel her inner Niall Ferguson but then she would (guilty conscience an’ all that). For anyone who isn’t British, for anyone who’s people and nation suffered grotesque horrors and pain at the hands of a demonstrably evil empire to even hesitate over the question is… well, questionable.

But then, as I said, Castle Catholics.

Meanwhile Fintan O’Toole in the Irish Times, supposed media liberal doyen, fluffs his feathers in outrage all the while failing to see the irony in his crowing:

“SOMETIMES, YOU forget how tenuous and fragile a thing is the Irish State, how little it means to so many of its citizens. By the State, I don’t mean the nation, the flag, pride in being Irish – all that visceral emotion. I mean, rather, two rational things, one tangible, the other abstract.

The State is a set of institutions – the Government, the Oireachtas, the Civil Service, public services, the law, the courts. It is also a broad but crucial sense of mutual dependence – the idea that there’s a collective self that goes beyond the narrow realms of family and locality.

And then, every so often, there’s a moment when those assumptions crumble. The idea that the vast majority of people are loyal to the State is suddenly exposed for what it is: a useful fiction. What happens is that very large numbers of people who would never think of themselves as criminals or subversives reveal the truth that they don’t really have much time for key State institutions such as the law and the courts and that they simply don’t believe that there is an over-arching common good that means anything when you set it against more potent local loyalties.

Nor do these decent, respectable people believe that there is a common good that operates at the level of the State and that could possibly outweigh an almost feudal loyalty to a local hero. The State, for them, is a vague, hazy and distant thing – too nebulous to command any real fidelity. The idea that encouraging the Quinns’ to siphon off €455 million of public assets might harm their fellow citizens has no meaning for them because, deep down, they don’t actually believe that there are such creatures as fellow citizens. There are good GAA people, good Cavan people, good Fermanagh people – those are the “imagined communities” that command respect and allegiance. A larger citizenship signifies nothing. The people who might be harmed by the Quinns’ actions are not Us but Them.”

Of course it might have helped to maintain the loyalty of these citizens if the State had not abandoned them at the end of the War of Independence, if it did not sacrifice their democratic rights and freedom to secure the return to power of the Quisling regime of conservative, right-wing politicians, businessmen and church elders after a bloody revolution had temporarily pushed them to one side. The self-same people who then grew fat on the rich pickings of the personal fiefdoms in the mafia state they engendered. And who have now sold us out to a new set of masters.

But then, we are back to the Castle Catholics again.