Incredible news today that an official investigation into the Loughinisland Massacre has concluded that there was no collusion or co-operation between Unionist terrorists and the Royal Ulster Constabulary or RUC, the disbanded former paramilitary police force in the North of Ireland. The 1994 attack on a local, rural pub in County Down resulted in the murder of six Irish civilians, including an 87 year old man, by gunmen from the British terrorist group the UVF. Since the killings speculation has been rife that RUC officers in the area covered up for and protected the terrorists. It has also been suggested the some members of the RUC were aware of the imminent attack before hand and allowed it to go ahead.
The report by the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland has concluded that, though vital physical evidence related to the crime was mishandled or destroyed and that no proper investigation was made into related Unionist terrorist activities in the region, there was no act of ‘collusion’ between the RUC and the UVF.
‘A report by Northern Ireland’s Police Ombudsman into the RUC’s handling of the Loughinisland atrocity 17 years ago has found there were failings in the police investigation into the murders.
Failures include the unauthorised destruction of the killers’ get-away car and the failure to investigate properly the link between the Loughinisland shootings and other terrorist attacks.
Al Hutchinson’s report says the original police inquiry lacked ‘effective leadership and investigative diligence’.
However, it said there is ‘insufficient’ evidence of collusion between the group behind the attack and the security forces.’
The Irish Times points out some of the failures in the original RUC investigation highlighted in the report including:
‘Records were missing.
The car used by the UVF was improperly destroyed 10 months after the attack after lying outside a police station exposed to the elements.
Police failed to investigate properly the link between the Loughinisland shootings and other terrorist attacks.
Failures in the management of the murder incident room in the early stages and in the management of the computer system used by the investigation may also have resulted in the loss of evidential opportunities.’
That the Ombudsman’s can claim, in the context of the conflict in the North of Ireland and the notorious record of the RUC, that there was no collusion between the official and unofficial arms of Britain’s counter-insurgency war in Ireland is beyond belief.
British paramilitary police in Ireland co-operating with British paramilitary terrorists in Ireland? Same old story, same old conflict.
- NI Police Ombudsman: “we have no evidence of a deliberate action…” (sluggerotoole.com)
- Loughinisland Report A Farce Which Fails to Examine Role of Special Branch Informers (politics.ie)
- Loyalty Versus Counter-Insurgency – Or What To Do When The British No Longer Need You? (ansionnachfionn.wordpress.com)
- UVF Organised Attacks On Nationalist Enclave (ansionnachfionn.wordpress.com)
- PSNI Were Intended Target (ansionnachfionn.wordpress.com)
- We Think It’s Now Time Al Hutchinson for You to Resign ” Colllusion Is Not an Illusion” (seachranaidhe1.wordpress.com)
- collusion was not an illusion !!The Rosemary Nelson inquiry has decided security services did not collude – but they did share her killers’ culture (seachranaidhe1.wordpress.com)