Republican Activists Quit The Belfast Branch Of Saoradh

Well that didn’t take long. Saoradh, the Irish republican party formed last September, has experienced its first serious split with the resignation of twenty-three members from its Belfast branch. According to the activists they were responding to the expulsion of Harry Fitzsimons, the former chairperson in the city, who was forced from the grouping following a series of internal arguments between the local membership and the national leadership. The unionist-leaning Belfast Telegraph claims that these disagreements came about because of concerns over “financial irregularities” and other matters. However this has been dismissed by several people close to the controversy. Whatever the case, here is the Saoardh statement on the matter:

Saoradh express disappointment at recent resignations from the Party following the dismissal of Harry Fitzsimons, the former Belfast Chairperson. Mr Fitzsimons has been afforded due process in accordance with the Party Constitution, including the right to appeal the decision to dismiss which was authorised by the Party’s National Executive. Mr Fitzsimons did not notify the Party of his intention to appeal.

Saoradh investigates all matters, including that of its members’ conduct, which comes to the attention of the Party, impartially and with respect to the member’s rights in accordance with the Party’s constitution.

To conclude, Saoradh will not be distracted from the revolutionary path it has embarked upon; be it by the deliberate opportunism of sections of the media or by the naive or deliberate actions of individuals.

The usually well-sourced blog, El Norte de Irlanda, has published the joint-resignation letter from the former Belfast activists, albeit in Spanish (if you are using Chrome as your internet browser, Google should offer to auto-translate the webpage for you). While Saoradh has seen some modest growth, its members and their families have suffered continuous – and very public – harassment by the British authorities in the UK-administered north-east. This has no doubt curtailed its potential to develop as a political party.

Advertisements

9 comments

  1. You mention harassment Saoradh receives from British authorities. Would these be the PSNI? The same British authorities backed by Sinn Fein,a party you never criticise?

      1. My point is how can a party that supports a British police force that attacks republicans be considered a republican party?

  2. Who said 23 people resigned?Are you basing this on the media or from the person who was dismissed. I think that figure is quite wrong and it was either calculated by someone not very good in the maths department, or it was invented by someone who thought they were bigger than an organisation and needs it for his ego .

    1. I think they are getting the numbers from the resignation statement that has 23 names on it, hardly rocket science.

    2. From the people who resigned. They are doing their own press briefing. I’m hearing different versions of the same story, or set of stories, from different sources but I’m not plugged into that scene. Anyone who knows better has an open invite to use ASF as a platform to air their version of the controversy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s