Current Affairs Politics

Gay Mitchell: Right-Wing, Conservative, Christian… And President Of Ireland?

[For an updated and much expanded overview of Gay Mitchell’s conservative Christian links click here, including his alleged association with the influential Roman Catholic political organisation known as the Dignitatis Humanae Institute]

In the interest of balance, since we have had a lot of focus on poor David Norris, lets look at his main rival, Fine Gael’s Gay Mitchell (don’t get worried, the Gay is short for Gabriel!). The Daily Mail reported a while ago on the Blueshirts’ second-place choice for the office of Uachtarán na hÉireann:

‘He was the shock choice of Fine Gael as its presidential candidate: a man who, according to many in the party, achieved the nomination because he wasn’t Pat Cox rather than because he was Gay Mitchell.

But now the MEP has achieved the huge prize of becoming the official candidate of the governing party, a nation’s voters are starting to wonder just who he really is… and they may be in for something of a shock.

For, far from being a quiet backwoodsman, Gay Mitchell is a combative – some might even say prickly – politician with some pretty eyebrow-raising views about Ireland, including his support for a radical anti-abortionist who murdered a doctor in the U.S.’

Yikes. It gets worse, including a rather gratuitous reference to Mitchell’s notorious cousin, George ‘the Penguin’ Mitchell. But I suppose having a president whose distant relative is a leading figure in Dublin’s criminal sub-culture is every bit as potentially embarrassing as having a president whose former partner is a convicted paedophile.

The report goes on with some more choice revelations:

‘He has been particularly outspoken in his anti-abortion views and association with Christian Democracy.

In 2003, Mr Mitchell called on then Florida governor Jeb Bush to spare the life of Paul Hill, who in 1994 murdered a doctor and his bodyguard because the medic performed abortions. But Hill was executed by lethal injection.

Last year, Mr Mitchell invited to Dublin Dr Alveda King, a radical anti-­abortion activist and a niece of Dr Martin Luther King. The American has for years been a flashpoint for controversy, making statements that include comparing abortion to racism and likening gay marriage to genocide.’

Indeed Alveda King is a militant Christian fundamentalist, a friend of the right-wing American media demagogue Glenn Beck, and someone I most certainly would not be comfortable having as a friend of any potential head of the Irish state. Whatever about Mitchell’s views on abortion, I would be very interested in hearing what his opinions are on homosexuality and whether he agree’s with King’s infamous statement that:

‘God hates racism and God hates homosexuality.’

He regularly focuses on issues relating to the global Christian community and its alleged persecution as his website shows:

‘Gay Mitchell MEP has co-sponsored a European Parliament motion condemning attacks against Christians in the EU and beyond. “Over the past number of weeks, there has been a shocking escalation of violence against Christian people because of their faith. The European Union represents unity and diversity, we need to stand up for those values and protect religious freedom.”

On Christmas Eve, more than 80 Christians were killed by Islamic fundamentalist groups in several cities of Nigeria. During Christmas morning service at the Church of Agios Synesios, located in the northern Turkish-occupied part of Cyprus, police officers of the illegal Turkish Cypriot regime entered the church, forced the priest to stop the liturgy and forced the priest and the Christian Orthodox Cypriot worshippers out of the church. While on New Year’s Eve, a car bomb exploded in front of a Coptic church in Alexandria, Egypt, killing 21 people.’

Mitchell also appears on the website of the Iona Institute, a sort of conservative Christian think-tank and advocacy group, and is named (along with fellow Fine Gael member Lucinda Creighton) in this copy of a recent Iona Institute email:

‘Final version of EPP manifesto a big improvement on draft
Summary: A number of weeks ago we sent out an e-letter detailing how the European People’s Party’s draft election manifesto for next month’s European elections looked set to weaken the EPP’s commitment to the right to life and the family based on marriage. The good news is that the final version of the manifesto is greatly improved over the draft and basically reinstates those commitments. Please read on for more detail.

EPP election manifesto is now fully pro-family, pro-life and pro-religion

The European People’s Party is the group of parties in the European Parliament that comprises mainly of Christian Democratic parties from throughout the EU. Fine Gael is a member. Ahead of next month’s elections to the European Parliament it debated its election manifesto. The draft manifesto represented a significant step backwards from a pro-life and family viewpoint compared with the 2004 manifesto.

After further debate, culminating in an EPP meeting in Warsaw at the end of April, the final version of the manifesto has been agreed and it is far better than the original draft. For example, it drops the ‘family diversity’ language contained in the draft and in a nod to Judeo-Christian values says that we must be “intolerant of intolerance of our own value system and beliefs”.

The most significant addition to the final version of the manifesto is a reference to a document called ‘A Union of Values’ agreed by the EPP at a meeting in Berlin in 2001. In its opposition to abortion, destructive research on embryos and euthanasia, it is thoroughly pro life document. In addition, it contains the statement that “families where fathers and mothers take responsibility for their children are the foundation of society.”

In fact, the Berlin statement of values is more emphatically pro-life than anything produced by any of the mainstream parties in Ireland in recent year. (Note: We can email you a PDF of Berlin document upon request).

The manifesto itself is also excellent with regard to how parents reconcile family life and work. It favours empowering parents to decide whether to raise their children at home or to put them in child-care.

We understand that Gay Mitchell MEP (…) and Lucinda Creighton (…) played a significant part in getting the draft manifesto changed for the better.’

Interesting friends. And troubling too. As it is, Gay Mitchell has already suggested that the British head of state should become the head of state of any new all-Ireland nation (i.e. we should cease to be a republic – hardly making him a suitable candidate for the office of the president of that republic) and expressed opinions in the aftermath of the Lisbon Treaty referendums that Irish voters should not be given a say in these matters (i.e. we are too stupid to decide things best left to our masters –  very democratic, I’m sure). Perhaps, now that the media has sifted through every part of David Norris’ public and private affairs, it is time to focus on Gay Mitchell? Do we really want a conservative, right-wing Christian as the President of Ireland?

9 comments on “Gay Mitchell: Right-Wing, Conservative, Christian… And President Of Ireland?

  1. How does one compare that to Norris asking on state paper that his partner get an easy ride by the courts for having sex with a minor? A 15 year old boy for god sake.

    Plus when these type of accusations came out a while back in the race, he denied it all and said people were trying to damage his campaign. Yet he pleads for mercy for a friend?

    Plus Mitchell was asking that the death penalty be avoided, not that they be released. Ireland, and a lot of other countries, don’t support this.

    Come on now, get over it.


  2. Your right Sully, it doesn’t compare, its far worse! Murder versus consensual sex with a boy who was below the legal age in Israel – different culture and norms, he would be above age of consent in the likes of Spain, a Catholic country. A large proportion of the Afghan population would be regarded as paedophiles in the West. And Norris wrote little more than a character reference. Mitchell usurped the courts and tried to get the Governor to overrule their decision because the guy was a Christian fanatic, not because he condemned the death penalty. Would he have done it for a non-christian, of course not.


  3. smashcakes

    Gay Mitchell voted against a proposal to freeze the salaries and expenses of MEP’s earlier this year which was supported by Irish MEP’s


  4. 1stGay-President

    Gay Mitchell for PRESIDENT, we don’t abandon our own like the so-called liberals abandoned Norris!!!!


  5. Just a suggestion: Please, do not use the word ‘paedophile’ when referring to David Norris’ former partner. It is misleading and incorrect. The proper term is ephebofile, if anything.


    • Thanks for the Comment but I think you are being slightly disingenuous. Most people would see little difference between ephebophilia and paedophilia and many experts regard it as a deliberately ambiguous concept. The victim was a teenage boy below legal age, the accused a middle-aged man. He was convicted of the offence. I think it can qualify as paedophilic behaviour.


      • I was being glib when I suggested the use of ‘ephebofile’. Paedophilia is defined as a sexual interest in prepubescent children. A fifteen-year-old does not fall inside that category. Ezra was convicted of satutory rape of a boy who was less than six months away from the age of consent, not paedophilia. It absolutely could not qualify as paedophilic behaviour, and there is nothing ambiguous about it. There is no point in debating it; the term simply doesn’t apply here.


  6. I wonder if he censors stuff like you do


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: