Current Affairs Economics Journalism Politics

The DUP, AggregateIQ And Data Mining For The Alt-Right And Far-Right

With the press and news media focusing on the Russian Federation’s alleged contribution to the election of Donald Trump to the White House last November, it’s all too easy to miss the real political scandals out there. While there is no doubt that the New York millionaire and Vladimir Putin do have business interests in common, as might be expected of the many-tentacled kleptocracy in Russia, evidence of Moscow “hacking” the United States’ presidential election is largely absent. Working to gain the trust and gratitude of Trump’s inner circle, or to load the political and media dice in his favour, is quite different from rigging an election. Arguably the only suspect thing in the US voting system nine months ago was the use of the antiquated and undemocratic Electoral College. However that is the fault of the American constitution, not the Russian preference for sowing dissent and confusion among its enemies (which you could interpret as a sign of post-superpower weakness rather than of proto-superpower strength).

In fact, we should turn closer to home to see a more unambiguous example of a political conspiracy at work. In this case, the lobbyists and businesses behind 2016’s anti-European Union referendum in the United Kingdom. Questionable behaviour beyond anything proven with Donald Trump and his comically incompetent associates seems to be the norm in the disputed history of Brexit. This is especially true of the Democratic Unionist Party, the British separatist grouping in the north-east of Ireland, and its role during the plebiscite. We now know that the DUP was used as a front-organisation for the mysterious anti-EU Constitutional Research Council, funnelling nearly half-a-million pounds of the latter’s money into an advertising blitz in Britain advocating a “Leave” vote. The ultra-nationalist party also committed £32,750 to social media advertising through an obscure data analytics company based in Canada, called AggregateIQ. This in turn was receiving millions of pounds from the “official” Vote Leave campaign and a myriad of other right-wing groupings in the UK. To add to the suspect nature of all this, the Canadian firm was also doing additional work with Cambridge Analytica, a business associated with Donald Trump’s successful presidential election run in 2015-16.

However, the dealings between the DUP and AggregateIQ did not confine themselves to the Europhobic ballot in the United Kingdom, with the company working for the extreme unionist group during the northern assembly elections in this country last March. From the Detail:

…the DUP paid AggregateIQ £12,000 as part of its March 2017 Northern Ireland Assembly election campaign.

Over £3,300 of this was paid to AggregateIQ for services provided to the campaigns of three DUP candidates, while a further £8,600 was paid for services provided to the party.

Given AggregateIQ’s prominent role in the referendum campaign, The Detail asked the DUP for information on the work the company carried out in the March 2017 Stormont election, but the party did not respond.

We also contacted AggregateIQ with similar queries but it declined to comment.

It seems that we should put aside most of our worries about the mischievous inferiority complex of the Russian Federation and focus instead on a small conservative and libertarian camp among a clique of global plutocrats extending from North America to Europe. One which haphazardly seeks to subvert and lessen democratic control upon its activities and finances in the West by promoting the divisive politics of right-wing populism, regressive nationalism and xenophobic conservatism.

5 comments on “The DUP, AggregateIQ And Data Mining For The Alt-Right And Far-Right

  1. ar an sliabh

    Hear, Hear! Let’s not be like the Americans and be played like a two-bit fiddle.


  2. the Phoenix

    I don’t see a problem with what the DUP did. The EU has unlimited wealth to spread disinformation and probably did. Besides,what exactly is democratic about the EU? Who elected Druncker? Just like in the US election,yet again Seamy you side with unelected elites over the will of people. Shameful.


    • Alan Gordon

      Phoenix. Correct me please if I’m wrong. Junker was selected by the people we elect. Much the same as the speaker of the house (Westminster). He is the commission, similar to UK civil servants working for the EU parliament and council, both of these are elected representatives. It might not make for the speediest of legislation review and enacting but I would say safe, to say nothing of strong and steady.


      • the Phoenix

        Doesn’t matter. EUSSR is inherently undemocratic. It infringes on nation’s sovereignty. Especially small nations. Druncker is a dictator.


        • EU Citizen

          The EU is entirely democratic. No nation is entirely sovereign. All trade and all international agreements involved sharing of sovereignty. The UK has more unelected politicians than the EU and all other EU countries combined. The EU parliament is directly elected and the commission is appointed by democratically elected govts. It works for me and it works for most people in Ireland; the last survey put remaining in the EU at 88% support and it’s probably risen and will rise some more as people see the shambles the UK is making of “taking back control”.

          You come across as a loon. “Druncker”? Is that the best you can do?


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: